#Litespeed web server pros and cons install
#Litespeed web server pros and cons free

For any questions on servers and infrastructure, contact us anytime. Which web server do you use and why? Which features are more important for your use case? LetвЂ™s discuss. For example, Nginx can be the load balancer and serve static files, while Apache runs in the back-end on multiple servers, with per-directory settings. In an extended infrastructure, you can combine the strengths of various web servers in order to create an effective setup. Caddy works great if you need simplicity, while Lighthttpd works best when resources are low. Nginx is a very fast and powerful option, Apache is a great general-purpose web server, while LiteSpeed represents a premium alternative. Now that we know their advantages and disadvantages, which web server is the best? The answer depends on your use case. Unsuitable for complex projects that require other settings than its defaults.Supports load balancing, proxying, and WebSockets.

HTTPS is enabled by default and certificates are renewed automatically.The binary doesnвЂ™t need any dependencies or libraries, which makes it perfect for containers.

#Litespeed web server pros and cons install

Very easy to install and configure with the default settings.

#Litespeed web server pros and cons free

The free version is limited and poorly documentedД¬addy is a newest entry on the list and was designed from the start to be as simple to configure as possible, while offering strong security features.

Advanced caching options, the paid version has modules tweaked for the most popular CMS and ecommerce platforms.

Can be administered from a GUI interface.

Comes with its own very effective php handler (lsapi).

htaccess and rewrite rules), so it can instantly replace it as a much faster web server for shared hosting

The enterprise version is fully compatible with Apache configuration files (including.

Very high performance due to its event-driven architecture.

LiteSpeed comes in two versions: a free one known as OpenLiteSpeed and a paid enterprise version with extended functionality.

Only uses a single CPU thread, so performance is limited.

Handles requests asynchronously, similar to Nginx.

Unlike its competitors, Lighthttpd was developed for a specific purpose, as a web server for systems with limited resources.

Modules are normally enabled during build time, and recompilation is needed in order to change them.

Not suitable for shared hosting on its own, since there is no.

When used with PHP-FPM, it is the best option for Wordpress websites.

Supports many useful features such as load balancing, static and dynamic caching, reverse proxy setups or WebSockets.

Built on an asynchronous architecture in order to handle high loads.

High performance, in particular when serving static files.

Nginx was designed from the start as a solution to the limitations of the Apache web server, especially for its inability to handle thousands of concurrent connections.

Updates are not very frequent and new technologies are integrated slowly.

CanвЂ™t handle a large number of simultaneous requests.

Not as fast as some of the newer alternatives.Offers a choice between several MultiProcessing Modules (MPMs) that handle connections.Has a dynamic module system that can be used to add new features.Widely available documentation and tutorials.htaccess files, which makes it ideal for shared hosting It was released back in 1995 and it is available by default in most Linux distributions. Apache is still the most widely use web server in the world, due to several reasons.